Non-consensual personified sexbots: an intrinsic wrong

Abstract Humanoid robots used for sexual purposes (sexbots) are beginning to look increasingly lifelike. It is possible a user have bespoke sexbot created which matches their exact requirements in skin pigmentation, hair and eye colour, body shape, genital design. This means that it possible—and easy—for be bears very high degree of resemblance particular person. There small but steadily increasing literature exploring some the ethical issues surrounding sexbots, however sexbots made like people something which, as yet, has not been philosophically addressed literature. In this essay I argue creating lifelike represent resemble someone an act objectification morally requires consent, doing so without person’s consent intrinsically wrong. consider two creators: Roy Fred. creates Katie with her Fred Jane consent. draw on work Alan Goldman, Rae Langton, Martha Nussbaum demonstrate person if permissible.